Search Results

As a former member of the City Council, I am profoundly troubled by the recent decision made by the Winnipeg City Council. The passage of controversial amendments that sideline public consultation regarding infill housing marks a dire shift in the city's approach to development and democracy and ignores the glaring need to overhaul the broken permitting process in the city. Under these changes, developers gain unchecked power to erect up to four housing units on residential lots city-wide without any avenue for affected residents to voice concerns. This move fundamentally undermines the public's right to participate in shaping their neighbourhoods. Only three councillors, Brian Mayes, John Orlikow, and Shawn Dobson, were opposed to the controversial changes. All others supported the move. The alterations in policy are sweeping. They legalize the construction of multiple housing units, up to four units on a single lot throughout all neighbourhoods in the city, enable four-story buildings within 800 meters of transit corridors, and allow mid-rise housing in commercial areas without the need for prior zoning or variance approval. This "as-of-right" approval process bypasses essential public hearings and committee assessments. The rationale cited for these changes revolves around the urgent need for more affordable housing. However, the definition of "affordable" remains glaringly ambiguous. Genuine affordable housing, in my experience, should be far more substantial than the meagre 10 to 20% below market rates that are considered at the city council. It must aim for housing costs that do not exceed 30 to 35% of a household's income to truly alleviate the housing crisis. But, this was not included in the sweeping changes. It concerns me that while the city optimistically eyes the potential federal funding and pledges to add 5,277 housing units by fall 2026, it continues to put up roadblocks, stalling approximately 6,000 residential infill units ready to go today. Projects like Parker Lands and the re-development of Polo Park have been hindered by bureaucratic hurdles and political motions, exacerbating the housing shortage instead of remedying it. What's most disheartening is the lack of comprehensive deliberation before implementing these changes. No consideration was given to the uncertain nature of the promised $192 million in funding. The funding is not guaranteed. Why was that not considered? The council's failure to consider negotiation alternatives is indicative of a lack of leadership and business acumen among our elected officials. Instead of blindly following federal mandates, we could have negotiated a unique agreement tailored to our city's needs. Negotiation fosters communication and ensures decisions are in alignment with the community's requirements. A clause ensuring no changes until the approval of the entire $192 million should have been a basic negotiation tactic, yet it was disregarded. The decision made by an overwhelming majority of the council reeks of reactionary politics, hastily implemented without due consideration for the citizens it impacts. Democracy demands discussion and inclusion, especially when contemplating the elimination of public input in critical decisions. The alarming swiftness with which these changes were pushed through, led by the Mayor and supporting council members, is deeply concerning. The rushed nature of these amendments exemplifies a disconcerting trend of disregarding public input in critical decisions. When the elimination of democratic processes becomes the norm, it is imperative that we, as engaged citizens, demand more extensive discussions and transparent decision-making. I’m the first to say we need a complete overhaul of the permitting system in Winnipeg. There are too many steps in the process for builders, too many departments for applicants to speak to, information that is not provided to developers until the final stages, and more. Resident consultation is just one of those many steps. So, let’s be honest and address the real problems that will expedite development in our city, not just sell out to the Trudeau government. City Council's unilateral push to silence public voices in matters that directly impact our neighbourhoods cannot go unchallenged. It's imperative that we hold our representatives accountable for their decisions and demand a return to a more inclusive, consultative approach to shaping the future of our city.

In a shocking display of misplaced priorities, Justin Trudeau's government recently announced it is considering a staggering one billion dollar cut from Canada's defence budget. This move has sent shockwaves across the nation, leaving many Canadians questioning the Prime Minister's commitment to their safety and security. While fiscal responsibility is essential, cutting funds from our military while other areas of excessive spending remain untouched is not only misguided but also deeply concerning. One area that desperately needs scrutiny is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), a taxpayer-funded institution that has long been criticized for its exorbitant expenditures. The CBC's receives over $1.2 billion in government funding, which raises serious questions about where our taxpayer dollars are being allocated. With over a thousand staff earning six-figure salaries annually, it's evident that there is significant room for financial reform within this institution. Justin Trudeau's failure to address this issue while slashing the defense budget demonstrates a profound lack of judgment and a skewed sense of priorities. The collaboration between the Liberal and NDP coalition in Ottawa has further deepened the sense of disillusionment among Canadians. Our military, once respected on the global stage, is now being treated with disrespect, rendering it an embarrassment for our nation. While Trudeau and his allies champion their progressive agendas, they seem to have forgotten the fundamental duty of any government: to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. Canada's armed forces have a proud history of peacekeeping and international cooperation, but these achievements are at risk due to potential ill-conceived budget cuts. Our military personnel deserve better than to be undermined and undervalued by their own government. The consequences of these cuts would be far-reaching, affecting not only our national security but also our credibility on the global stage. It is time for Canadians to demand accountability from their leaders. Trudeau must be held responsible for his reckless decision that could compromise our nation's security while ignoring the glaring issues within institutions like the CBC. Our military personnel, who sacrifice so much for our safety, deserve better. We must demand a government that prioritizes the well-being of its people and upholds our reputation as a nation that values its security and sovereignty above all else. Anything less is a betrayal of the trust Canadians have placed in their elected officials.

In a spectacle framed by indigenous drumming and grand declarations, Premier Wab Kinew's throne speech caught the attention of many with a flurry of promises yesterday. Yet, as the echoes of the ceremony faded, skepticism loomed large over the feasibility of turning these pledges into tangible realities. The speech, hailed by some for its aspirational tone, failed to provide concrete plans or funding details, leaving a trail of uncertainties in its wake. Premier Kinew's attribution of a worse financial state left by the previous administration contradicts earlier claims of a $200 million surplus announced by the Government prior to election. Such inconsistencies beg the question: what's the real state of Manitoba's finances? Many commitments in the throne speech appear to be mere echoes of prior announcements by the NDP Government. Promises in healthcare—more surgical capacity, a mobile MRI, and the reopening of the Victoria Hospital ER—lack crucial details on staffing and funding sources. How will these objectives be achieved? Where will resources come from? Moreover, several assurances ride on the Trudeau Liberals' directives, such as funds for geothermal heat pumps and the mammoth investment in replacing aging infrastructure at Manitoba Hydro. Despite promises against privatization, the plan lacks depth, relying heavily on federal financial support. But at what cost? The speech overlooked critical issues like violent crime, gang-related activities, and drug trafficking. While vowing to end homelessness in eight years, the plan lacks strategies to tackle the issues or how they will be addressed. There's no mention of addressing the pressing concerns of gang violence or drug trafficking —major challenges plaguing the province. The pledge to make prescription birth control free and to increase access to abortions, was vague, how will these services be funded and sustained? Similarly, the pledge to eliminate the gasoline tax lacks clarity—how long will it be a temporary relief be in place and how will the government replace the millions in funding? Furthermore, promises to freeze Hydro rates lacked any details. For how long? How will this impact the operations? Can the government bypass the Public Utilities Board in controlling rates? While commitments to acknowledge Louis Riel as the first premier of Manitoba and make Orange Shirt Day a statutory holiday commendably recognize historical significance, they beg the question: are these symbolic gestures overshadowing the need to address the affordability issue that all Manitobans face. As the dust settles on this ambitious throne speech, Manitobans are left wondering whether these promises are attainable or merely lofty rhetoric. With a lack of detailed plans, unanswered funding queries, and uncertain fiscal footing, the skepticism surrounding the NDP's vows continues to grow. Time will tell if this vision translates into tangible progress or fades into the realm of political promises unfulfilled.

In a recent survey conducted by The Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce, a resounding 67% of respondents voiced their concern that revitalizing downtown Winnipeg should be a top priority for the new Premier and his government. This sentiment reflects the long-standing issues that have plagued our city, particularly concerning safety and the decades-long discussion about crime in our downtown core. It is, however, crucial to acknowledge that the responsibility for change does not rest solely with the provincial government. Mayor Gillingham and city councillors also bear a significant responsibility. Gillingham’s assertion that a safer downtown would attract more attendees to Jets games speaks volumes about the intersection of public safety and the economic vitality of our city. His comments beg the question, why has nothing been done? Winnipeg has earned the unsettling distinction of being ranked the least safe in a recent national poll comparing 34 cities. Violent crime has been on a steady rise for several years, prompting a growing demand for a comprehensive and decisive response from our elected officials. It's an undeniable fact that the lack of political will has perpetuated this problem, leaving our citizens vulnerable and our downtown in a state of disarray. The call to get tough on crime is not an endorsement of simplistic solutions or a disregard for the complexities of criminal behavior. Rather, it is a plea for a justice system that prioritizes the safety of our communities and places victims at the forefront. Striking the right balance between rehabilitation and punishment is essential to foster a society that is both just and secure. The argument for getting tough on crime centers around protecting the most vulnerable members of our society and ensuring that communities feel secure in their homes. By imposing stricter penalties on violent crimes and repeat offenders, we send a clear message that such actions will not be tolerated. This not only acts as a deterrent but also provides a sense of justice to those who have suffered due to criminal acts. It's crucial to recognize that getting tough on crime doesn't equate to arbitrary or excessive punishment. Rather, the focus should be on proportionality and fairness. For non-violent offenses and first-time offenders, alternative measures such as community service, counseling, and educational programs can effectively prevent reoffending. Rehabilitation efforts within the prison system, including job training and mental health support, are essential for preparing individuals for reintegration into society. However, the urgency of the situation demands immediate action. If our elected officials are unanimous in their agreement that downtown Winnipeg needs to flourish and that crime is the primary impediment, they must act decisively. It's time to think differently about crime prevention—view it as an investment, not an expense. Concrete steps can be taken now, starting with the strategic placement of surveillance cameras throughout downtown Winnipeg. Numerous studies show that cameras are effective as a deterrent to crime, and the city should leverage this technology to create a safer environment now. The Police Service could reallocate resources such as restricted duty officers. These members could monitor these cameras in real-time, enhancing public safety efficiently and effectively. Investing in proven, long-term solutions is the need of the hour. It's time for elected officials to demonstrate visionary leadership and commit to building a safer, more prosperous downtown Winnipeg. People deserve a criminal justice system that places victims and community safety at the forefront, creating an equitable society where individuals have the opportunities to make positive life choices. The time for action is now, and we look to our elected officials to rise to the occasion.

On Remembrance Day, driving along Portage Avenue, my wife, Heather, noticed people pasting posters on the window of the office for MP Marty Morantz, who is a member of the Jewish community. As a Canadian citizen and a staunch believer in the values that our great nation was built upon, I find it deeply troubling to witness the resurgence of vile hatred towards the Jewish people, reminiscent of the dark days of World War Two, especially on Remembrance Day. The day we remember the sacrifices made by countless young men, not just Canadians but from nations across the globe, who fought to eradicate such poisonous ideologies and hate. Today, it is disheartening to witness the seeds of division being sown in our own communities, manipulated by certain factions for their cause. The echoes of history reverberate with the horrors of anti-Semitism, and it is a stark reminder that we must remain vigilant against the forces that seek to divide us based on religion, race, or any other arbitrary criteria. Our brave soldiers fought side by side, transcending borders and differences, to eliminate the very hatred that now threatens to seep into the fabric of our society. As Canadians, we should be united in our rejection of hate in all its forms. Our history is built on the principles of tolerance, diversity, and inclusion, and it is our duty to uphold these values. The very reason why so many people choose to make Canada their home. We must not allow ourselves to be swayed by the divisive tactics of those who seek to exploit current conflicts. It is particularly disconcerting to witness the manipulation of this devastating situation by certain elements on one side of the political spectre, who, instead of fostering unity, seem intent on deepening the fault lines within our communities. This is not the Canada our forefathers envisioned—a land where citizens stand divided and torn apart by hatred. We must resist falling into the trap of political or religious polarization and recognize the common ground that unites us. In times like these, it is crucial for us, as Canadians, to reaffirm our commitment to the values that make our nation exceptional. We must stand shoulder to shoulder against hatred and work towards building bridges, not walls. Let us remember the sacrifices of those who fought valiantly to eliminate the scourge of intolerance and let their legacy serve as a guiding light in these challenging times. Canada is a nation that prides itself on its inclusivity and compassion. As we navigate these troubled waters, let us do so with the knowledge that our strength lies in our unity. It is imperative that we resist the divisive forces and work towards a Canada where the spirit of brotherhood prevails and hatred finds no fertile ground to grow. Kevin Klein is a former Manitoba Conservative Minister, MLA, the former Chair of the Winnipeg Police Board, and a former Winnipeg City Councillor and CEO & Publisher of Sun Media Manitoba.

The Lemay Forest, a 22-acre parcel of land nestled on the South side of the St Norbert Heritage Trail, has become the center of a fierce debate, revealing a fatal flaw in our governing body - a flaw that is a consequence of reactionary politics. The Lemay Forest has a history intertwined with the community, but years ago, it was purchased with the intent of developing homes. As a developer sets their sights on this land and navigates the bureaucratic maze at City Hall, residents in the area are voicing grave concerns again. Dana Derkson, a concerned resident, shared her frustration with me in an email, stating, "We have been told several stories over many years of what would be built on this property. Obviously, determining what is truth has been very difficult." She also pointed out the essential role the forest plays in the community's ecosystem. I reached out to Councillor Markus Chambers for insight into the proposed project, and he echoed the concerns voiced by Dana. Chambers admitted that there are too many challenges associated with the subject property, including a lack of capacity for city water and sewer, issues with access in and out from the proposed development, and the potential for flooding development. He clarified that he is not opposed to development, but he believes it should not occur in this specific location. The real question that arises from this situation is why nobody acted proactively to protect the forest decades ago, or even just five years ago, knowing of all these issues. Why does the city not provide these critical issues to investors before they invest millions to purchase vacant land and begin the design and permitting phase, only to hit roadblocks and engage in heated battles with residents? There is a simple solution. This problem exemplifies the perils of reactionary politics. Our leaders often wait until negativity reaches a tipping point that could jeopardize their position in the community to act. There has been ample time to purchase the property in question and designate it as a greenspace reserve, or at the very least, plenty of time for the city to publicize the major hurdles, allowing investors to make informed purchasing decisions. The issue of water and sewer capacity is not unique to this development alone. Many developers have experienced their frustration with the city's fallback on this concern, resulting in additional expenses, which are then passed on to homebuyers and renters, artificially inflating housing costs. In this digital age, it should be feasible for the city to maintain an online map highlighting areas where water and sewer capacity is not available, potentially spurring more efficient development in other parts of the city. It's disheartening that, despite being told of a housing crisis, we witness numerous developments hitting a bureaucratic wall at City Hall. Elected officials must take responsibility and make changes to the system. They should identify areas where water and sewer capacity is limited and make this, and any issues that will impact development, information readily available to the public. Moreover, they should proactively acquire properties they wish to protect for environmental reasons, eliminating the public battle and stress to residents and investors. Make it easier for investors to develop in the city, be a good business partner and eliminate the frustration and financial setbacks. I spoke to one developer this week who has been battling the city to build on vacant land for over three years. This is not good business. We need leaders with vision who can address these concerns, making it easier for both investors and residents to thrive. The Lemay Forest issue is a stark reminder that we must not wait for a crisis to act but rather adopt a proactive approach for the benefit of our city and its citizens.

In the ever-changing landscape of politics, it is disheartening to witness the lack of visionary leadership among our elected officials. The recent flip-flopping of opinions, such as Wab changing his stance on the carbon tax at the First Minister's meeting, is just one symptom of a much larger problem plaguing our political arena. What we are witnessing is not just a single issue; it is a pervasive trend of reactionary decision-making that permeates all levels of government. It seems that our politicians today base their decisions on fleeting trends, social media pressures, and the demands of vocal activists rather than on a well-thought-out, long-term vision. The consequence? Our leaders are no longer shaping policies based on what is truly best for the people they represent. Instead, they echo the sentiments of the loudest and most persistent group, leaving us to wonder: Where is the foresight? Where is the strategic planning for our collective future? Take, for example, the alarming rise in violent crime that has plagued Winnipeg for the past decade. Elected officials pay lip service to the importance of making our downtown safe, yet their promises lack substance. Mayor Gillingham vaguely asserts that a safer downtown will boost ticket sales for the Jets, while Premier Kinew adopts a tough-on-crime stance without presenting a concrete vision of what 'safe' truly means. How long will it take to achieve this safety? What are the key performance indicators that will signal progress? The absence of clear answers to these questions highlights the dire need for a vision that goes beyond mere rhetoric. A clear, well-defined vision is not a luxury; it is a fundamental necessity in governance. It provides a roadmap for the future, offering guidance to policies, decisions, and actions in a unified direction. It articulates our collective aspirations and goals, laying the foundation for progress and development. A vision inspires us, gives us purpose, and fosters a sense of national unity. Moreover, it empowers governments to prioritize their efforts, allocate resources efficiently, and address pressing issues effectively. In the private sector, we understand the importance of setting clear objectives and goals is crucial. Strategic plans are meticulously crafted to align with the objectives, allowing us to measure our progress as we work toward our vision. The same principle can be applied to government if we elect leaders who possess genuine vision, not just empty promises. It is time for a change. We, the citizens, must demand more from our elected officials. We need leaders who can rise above the noise, articulate a compelling vision for our future, and have the courage to stand by their convictions. We deserve leaders who are not swayed by the latest social media trend or the demands of the vocal few. Only then can we truly work towards a safer, prosperous, and harmonious tomorrow. In the absence of visionary leadership, we risk drifting aimlessly, reacting to the whims of the moment rather than shaping our destiny. Let us demand more from our elected officials. Let us demand vision, accountability, and a steadfast commitment to the well-being of our community. Our future depends on it.

Through insightful discussions and in-depth analysis, the Let's Talk Manitoba podcast will ensure that no stone is left unturned, scrutinizing policies, decisions, and promises made by politicians. By fostering open dialogue and encouraging transparency, I hope to empower the public with information and encouraging responsible governance at every level. In Episode One of Let's Talk Manitoba, we discuss an issue that has been outstanding for decades, In 2003 the Clean Environment Commission told the NDP Government of the day that Winnipeg's North End Treatment Plant needed to be replaced, that direction was ignored by both provincial and city elected officials. Fast forward twenty-years and the outstanding issues have multiplied but elected officials continue to ignore them. Listen in as I speak with Councillor Brian Mayes, Chair of the Water and Waste Committee at the City of Winnipeg about the North End Treatment plant and polluting of Lake Winnipeg.

In a surprising turn of events this week, Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) employees, members of the Manitoba Government and General Employees' Union (MGEU), delivered a resounding rejection of the proposal from the new NDP Government. MGEU President Kyle Ross, in a candid interview on CJOB, expressed his disillusionment with the new NDP government, accusing them of exploiting union members' support during the election campaign. Ross claimed that the NDP had promised unwavering support, but their actions fell short, leaving many feeling betrayed. The rejection of the NDP's offer by MGEU members highlights a deep disappointment among those who had fervently supported the party during the election. These members had invested significant time and effort campaigning for the NDP, only to find their expectations dashed when it came to the government's support for their cause. However, just a day later, a revised contract proposal was presented to the MGEU, offering a higher general wage increase of three percent in the first year, three percent, 2.9 percent, and 2.8 percent in the second, third, and fourth years. Also included in the deal is a $1,800 signing bonus, in addition to retention adjustment percentages for years three and four and two-week lump sum pay for striking workers in consideration of the government’s transition period where bargaining could not take place, plus other benefits not disclosed. All things considered, a significant increase from the offer 24 hours before. The union membership accepted the new terms. Now, questions linger about the true cost of political promises, volunteer support, and the impact on Manitoba taxpayers. When the question of higher rates was posed to the newly appointed Justice Minister Matt Wiebe, he directed the media to ask MPI officials. Looking ahead, as MPI workers gear up for future contract negotiations, in just two years, the spectre of political influence looms large. How much will it cost Manitobans for the NDP Party to secure union support and members as volunteers in the next election? The intertwining of politics and labour negotiations raises ethical concerns. Should political interests manipulate unions for electoral gains? The notion of privatization, a taboo subject for many, surfaces as a potential solution to untangle this web of political influence and what some call payoffs. Considering privatization might seem controversial, but in light of recent events, it warrants serious consideration. Eliminating political interference from MPI negotiations could bring much-needed transparency and fairness to the bargaining table. However, such a move requires careful examination of its potential public impacts. Critics argue that privatization could jeopardize essential public services, yet proponents contend that it may enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and prevent undue political influence. The real question remains: do Manitobans deserve a government that prioritizes their needs over political maneuvering? Addressing this issue demands a broader conversation about government spending and revenue. As a former elected official in municipal and provincial politics, I believe governments grapple not with revenue problems but with spending problems. Elected leaders must have the courage to delve deep into department expenses, streamline management structures, and prioritize services based on residents' needs. By fostering a customer-focused, efficient government, resources can be reallocated without increasing taxes or debt. While the prospect of privatization may not be an immediate solution, it prompts Manitobans to reflect on the type of governance they deserve. The time has come for an open dialogue about the future of labour negotiations, political promises, and the role of government in delivering essential services. Manitobans deserve leaders who prioritize their well-being over personal popularity and political gains. A significant number of Manitobans express dissatisfaction with the current governing system across all levels. Elected representatives often prioritize their own positions over the needs of the constituents they serve. Instead of diligently examining how taxpayers' money is spent, these officials tend to opt for popular decisions at financial junctures rather than choosing the path that leads to a more robust and prosperous future for Manitoba. It's time to consider all options and demand the best from our elected officials.

In the mosaic of cultures that is modern Canada, there lies a subtle irony. A nation is known for its welcoming nature, tolerance, and diversity, yet finding itself at a crossroads where the very essence of its identity seems to be slipping away. The issue at hand is not about diversity; it’s about unity, pride, and the need to reconnect with our Canadian roots. In a world increasingly polarized along cultural lines, it’s high time we, as Canadians, stand up and take pride in our shared heritage. Born from the majestic landscapes of the Rockies to the vast expanse of the Atlantic, our Canadian identity is a tapestry woven with the threads of Indigenous heritage, French and British colonization, and the vibrant hues of immigrants from all corners of the globe. This diversity is our strength, but it should not overshadow the core of who we are: Canadians. If you were born in Canada, embrace it, celebrate it, and be proud of it. Somewhere along the way, in our efforts to be inclusive and accepting, we seem to have lost sight of our own identity. Too often, people identify with their heritage first, forgetting the rich culture, values, and traditions that being Canadian embodies. The maple leaf, the Rockies, hockey, politeness, and Tim Hortons – these are not just symbols; they are threads of a unique identity that binds us all. Pride in one’s heritage is undoubtedly important, but it should not overshadow our national pride. We need to strike a balance between celebrating our roots and embracing our Canadian identity. Our multiculturalism should enhance our Canadian-ness, not dilute it. It’s about acknowledging our differences while cherishing the common values that make us Canadian: tolerance, kindness, and a deep respect for diversity. The world looks to Canada as a beacon of multiculturalism, but let us not forget that this multiculturalism is built upon a foundation of Canadian values and ideals. Our identity is not about erasing our differences but about finding unity in our diversity. It’s about recognizing that regardless of our background, we all share the same land, breathe the same air, and have a shared responsibility towards building a better Canada for future generations. Returning to our Canadian identity does not mean rejecting our diverse heritage. Instead, it means embracing it within the context of being Canadian. It means understanding that being Canadian is not just a legal status; it’s a state of mind, a way of life. It’s about respecting Indigenous traditions, speaking both English and French, and appreciating the contributions of immigrants, while also understanding that, as Canadians, we have a unique identity that binds us together. So, let us raise our maple leaf flags high and be proud of the land we call home. Let us celebrate our Canadian achievements in arts, science, and humanitarian efforts. Let us acknowledge our mistakes and learn from them, for that is the true Canadian way. In a world where divisions seem to grow deeper every day, embracing our Canadian identity is not just a choice; it’s a responsibility. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, let us not forget who we are. Let us be Canadians first and foremost, for in embracing our identity, we find the strength to face the challenges of the future. In unity, there is strength; in pride, there is resilience. Together, let us reclaim our Canadian identity and show the world what it truly means to be Canadian.

In yet another legal setback, the City of Winnipeg grapples with mounting challenges, raising critical questions about the urgent need for substantial reforms within the Property and Development department. The recent blow struck on Oct. 27, by Court of King’s Bench Justice Vic Toews reverberates deeply. He ruled that the city has been delaying the sale of a Main Street property, marking a significant victory for Earls Holdings (Main Street) Ltd. This property, a source of contention since its 2012 sale to developer OGGI Investments Ltd., has become the latest battleground in a string of costly lawsuits afflicting our city. Despite a clause in the initial agreement allowing the city to repurchase the land for its original price of $690,000, the court declared the agreement null and void. Justice Toews stated that the city’s failure to demonstrate readiness and willingness to claim the property promptly had caused years of delay, hindering the development of the downtown area. The ruling allows Earls Holdings to proceed with the sale of the property, enabling them to invest in a new restaurant venture within Winnipeg. This ruling adds to a previous ruling finding the city at fault and awarding millions of dollars to the developer of Parker Lands. Let’s not forget the newest multi-million-dollar suit filed against the city regarding the St. James Civic Centre by a contractor involved in the project. These legal challenges spotlight a troubling pattern of neglect in our local government’s resource management. The financial toll of these legal battles is staggering. Funds intended for essential services like infrastructure, public safety, community programming, and water and waste facilities are funnelled into legal fees, settlements, and court expenses. Every citizen bears the burden of this financial strain. This pressing issue demands accountability from our elected representatives, including Mayor Scott Gillingham and city council members. These lawsuits tarnish our city’s reputation extensively. Ongoing legal conflicts portray us as disorganized and unreliable, dissuading potential investors and residents and impeding our capacity to attract opportunities vital for our local economy. Winnipeg deserves leaders capable of upholding a positive image and fostering an environment conducive to growth and prosperity. This article was published by the Winnipeg Sun Thursday, November 1, 2023.

In the wake of recent events, Winnipeg finds itself at a crossroads, grappling with a disturbing surge in hate crimes that have shaken our community to its core. This week, the Winnipeg Police Service uncovered a series of deeply troubling incidents indicative of a distressing trend that demands our collective attention and action. Since the conflict between Israel and Hamas, a group identified as a terrorist organization by the Canadian government, our city has witnessed an alarming rise in hate crimes. The month of October alone has seen multiple hate-motivated incidents, ranging from property damage to targeted vandalism. One particularly harrowing incident took place on October 22, 2023, when a River Heights family became victims of a hate crime. In the early hours of the morning, the shattering of their front window echoed through the neighbourhood. Investigation revealed that the window had been shot out. While the family escaped physical harm, the presence of a religious symbol near their front door led investigators to suspect a hate-motivated attack. Such acts of intolerance have no place in a society that champions diversity and inclusivity. It is imperative that we, as a community, stand united against these heinous acts. Our response must be resolute; we must condemn these crimes unequivocally. But condemnation alone is not enough. We must work collectively to ensure that these incidents are not only thoroughly investigated and punished but also prevented in the future. Now, more than ever, we must foster an environment where every member of our community feels safe, valued, and respected, regardless of their background or beliefs. Hate crimes, in all their forms, cannot be tolerated here. We must be vigilant in our efforts to educate, to foster understanding, and to promote acceptance. As neighbours and friends, we must reinforce the values that define us—a commitment to diversity, understanding, and compassion. Only through unity and a shared determination to eradicate hatred can we hope to build a future where every Winnipeg resident can live without fear, embracing the richness of our collective tapestry. Let this be our rallying cry: hate has no home here. The above was published in the Winnipeg Sun on October 29, 2023.