top of page

NDP Offer to MGEU MPI Workers Raises Questions About Political Interference

In a surprising turn of events this week, Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) employees, members of the Manitoba Government and General Employees' Union (MGEU), delivered a resounding rejection of the proposal from the new NDP Government. MGEU President Kyle Ross, in a candid interview on CJOB, expressed his disillusionment with the new NDP government, accusing them of exploiting union members' support during the election campaign. Ross claimed that the NDP had promised unwavering support, but their actions fell short, leaving many feeling betrayed.

The rejection of the NDP's offer by MGEU members highlights a deep disappointment among those who had fervently supported the party during the election. These members had invested significant time and effort campaigning for the NDP, only to find their expectations dashed when it came to the government's support for their cause.

However, just a day later, a revised contract proposal was presented to the MGEU, offering a higher general wage increase of three percent in the first year, three percent, 2.9 percent, and 2.8 percent in the second, third, and fourth years. Also included in the deal is a $1,800 signing bonus, in addition to retention adjustment percentages for years three and four and two-week lump sum pay for striking workers in consideration of the government’s transition period where bargaining could not take place, plus other benefits not disclosed. All things considered, a significant increase from the offer 24 hours before. The union membership accepted the new terms.

Now, questions linger about the true cost of political promises, volunteer support, and the impact on Manitoba taxpayers. When the question of higher rates was posed to the newly appointed Justice Minister Matt Wiebe, he directed the media to ask MPI officials.

Looking ahead, as MPI workers gear up for future contract negotiations, in just two years, the spectre of political influence looms large. How much will it cost Manitobans for the NDP Party to secure union support and members as volunteers in the next election? The intertwining of politics and labour negotiations raises ethical concerns. Should political interests manipulate unions for electoral gains? The notion of privatization, a taboo subject for many, surfaces as a potential solution to untangle this web of political influence and what some call payoffs.

Considering privatization might seem controversial, but in light of recent events, it warrants serious consideration. Eliminating political interference from MPI negotiations could bring much-needed transparency and fairness to the bargaining table. However, such a move requires careful examination of its potential public impacts.

Critics argue that privatization could jeopardize essential public services, yet proponents contend that it may enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and prevent undue political influence. The real question remains: do Manitobans deserve a government that prioritizes their needs over political maneuvering?

Addressing this issue demands a broader conversation about government spending and revenue. As a former elected official in municipal and provincial politics, I believe governments grapple not with revenue problems but with spending problems. Elected leaders must have the courage to delve deep into department expenses, streamline management structures, and prioritize services based on residents' needs. By fostering a customer-focused, efficient government, resources can be reallocated without increasing taxes or debt.

While the prospect of privatization may not be an immediate solution, it prompts Manitobans to reflect on the type of governance they deserve. The time has come for an open dialogue about the future of labour negotiations, political promises, and the role of government in delivering essential services. Manitobans deserve leaders who prioritize their well-being over personal popularity and political gains.

A significant number of Manitobans express dissatisfaction with the current governing system across all levels. Elected representatives often prioritize their own positions over the needs of the constituents they serve. Instead of diligently examining how taxpayers' money is spent, these officials tend to opt for popular decisions at financial junctures rather than choosing the path that leads to a more robust and prosperous future for Manitoba.

It's time to consider all options and demand the best from our elected officials.


bottom of page