top of page

Will Janice Lukes be held accountable?


Will Janice Lukes be held accountable?
Janice Lukes is being sued by Tartan Towing, who will have to pay the legal bill?

Accountability is a cornerstone of public service. Elected officials hold a special responsibility to act with integrity, transparency, and accountability for their words and actions. The recent lawsuit against Deputy Mayor Janice Lukes highlights an alarming trend in city governance that cannot be ignored. It’s time for Mayor Gillingham to take decisive action to uphold the credibility of Winnipeg’s leadership.

 

Tartan Towing’s defamation lawsuit against Lukes and Bison Towing director Zakria Shoaib is the latest in a troubling string of legal disputes tied to city hall. This comes just days after a company working on the north-end treatment plant encountered significant challenges with the city, leaving the project massively over budget and decades behind schedule. And who can forget the ongoing court battles over Fulton Grove (Parker Lands), which have already cost taxpayers millions? Winnipeg’s legal track record is dismal, and this latest controversy only deepens public frustration.

 

As Deputy Mayor, Lukes occupies a prominent and influential position within city council. She receives three paycheques from taxpayers—as a councillor, as deputy mayor, and as chair of public works. This means she holds significant responsibility for ensuring accountability and transparency. Yet, Lukes has approved countless contracts, including the one at the center of this lawsuit, without asking hard questions of the public service. Now, her public remarks have landed her in legal hot water, and taxpayers have every right to wonder: Will we end up footing her legal bill?

 

The lawsuit’s allegations stem from comments made during a radio interview, comments that Tartan Towing claims were defamatory and damaging to its business. If Lukes is found guilty, she must be held accountable for her words. This is not just about legal liability—it’s about leadership. At the very least, Mayor Gillingham must remove her as deputy mayor effective immediately. The position demands focus and integrity, qualities that are difficult to maintain while embroiled in a lawsuit. If Lukes is ultimately cleared of wrongdoing, her reinstatement could be considered. Until then, the integrity of city council requires her removal.

 

Furthermore, Lukes should excuse herself from any discussions or votes related to towing services until this matter is resolved. This is a basic step to avoid any perception of bias or conflict of interest. Winnipeg residents deserve to trust that their leaders are acting in the public’s best interest, not allowing personal or legal issues to influence decision-making.

 

This case also serves as a stark reminder of the need for greater scrutiny and oversight in city contracts. The city’s history of mismanaged projects and questionable procurement processes is well-documented. Whether it’s the Parker Lands fiasco or the north-end treatment plant, these issues point to systemic failures in accountability and governance. Lukes’ case is just another example of how these failures manifest, with significant consequences for taxpayers.

 

Mayor Gillingham has a clear choice to make. By taking decisive action, he can send a strong message that accountability matters in Winnipeg’s city hall. Removing Lukes as deputy mayor would demonstrate a commitment to upholding the integrity of city council. On the other hand, inaction risks eroding public trust even further.

 

Winnipeg cannot afford more scandals or mismanagement. City leaders must prioritize transparency, accountability, and good governance. That starts with holding elected officials to the same standards they demand of others.

Comments


bottom of page